Therefore, by comparing these poems of Baca and Bradstreet, it will be evidentthat these elements of writing: tone, diction, and imagery; are crucial factors that willaffect the way a reader perceives a poem. By analyzing the tones of these poems, one can see that they are virtually opposite. In Baca’s poem, it is evident from the very beginning that he’s setting a tone of utterdisbelief and vulnerability. In the first stanza Baca states how he was “numbed” as heturned the corner to his home, and braced his body to prepare for the “shock” he wouldfeel. The very second Baca saw his flaming home, he’s filled with horror and disbelief. Near the end, when he walks into his room he falls to his hands and knees and looksthrough the pile of ashes that once used to be his poems.
This part of the poem symbolizeshis falling apart; when he falls to his hands and knees it shows the extent of his sorrow. While Baca is torn apart, Bradstreet’s tone is ultimately one of acceptance. At first,Bradstreet’s tone is one of grievance and lamenting, but in the middle of the poem itchanges in which she states that she shouldn’t grieve over the loss of a home that didn’tbelong to her; a home that belonged to the almighty man “that gave and took”. In thisquote, she’s referring to God as being all-powerful and that the house has always belongedto him; and that he can give and take as he pleases. Therefore, she’s willing to accept theburning of her home, if its Gods will.
The imagery in both poems is very descriptive and vivid. In second stanza, Bacagives a vivid description of the busy scene, describing the crowd of neighbors and firementhat had gathered around “the charred husk of our(Baca’s) house”. Through the wholemess, Baca is struck with the reality that in his blazing home, were ten years worth ofpoems up in flames. Baca’s vulnerability is shown later in the poem once all the peoplehave left and its just him with his burned home. He provides great imagery of the black,charred rooms in his haunting house “brooding in its own black rebellion”. Unlike Baca,Bradstreet isn’t as materialistic about the objects that she lost in her home.
Throughout thepoem, she writes of all the things that she will no longer have that went up in flames, buttowards the end of the poem, she prevents her “heart to chide(break)”. She feels that theonly home she needs is the “house on high erect”, which is built by a person she calls the”mighty Architect”. Here, she visualizes heaven as the only home she needs, and that ifshe keeps her faith and composure, she will one day be able to reach the “Treasure” that”lyes above”. Baca focus more on the burning of his home for his source of imagery, whileBradstreet is more concerned with providing images of God, the man who will help her inThe use of diction and the form of each poem is very different in both poems. Byreading Baca’s poem it is very obvious that his poem is much more modern thanBradstreet’s.
His reference to a “fire-engine”, and “crackling walkie-talkies” is clearevidence that Baca wrote his poem in a modern era. Also, the structure of his poemdoesn’t follow a rhyme-scheme and doesn’t have a certain amount of lines per stanza, onceagain showing Baca’s contemporary style. On the other hand, Bradstreet’s “archaic”language and her rigid structure show that she wrote her poem in a much earlier era. Using words like “lye”, or “thee”, she gives the poem that archaic look.
Also, unlikeBaca’s poem, Bradstreet’s poem is structured with rhymed-couplets, having six lines inevery stanza, every two lines having rhyming endings. By comparing and contrasting the poems of both these authors, it’s obvious thattheir experiences and reactions to their fierce realization with the burning of their homeswere totally opposite. Baca’s poem was full of sorrow and dejection, while Bradstreet’semotions showed faith and determination. The main reason for this change could be in thefact that these authors lived in different time periods. Bradstreet lived during a Puritanicalera in which religion was the central part of life, while Baca lived in a more modern erawhere materialistic things are of more importance.
Which is why their diction and imageryBibliography: