All of these things, with the addition of her constant wavering of one extreme to another, contribute to her suicide in the end. Throughout the story, Emmas foolishness and mood fluctuations lead to the eventual breakdown of her stability in life. In the beginning of the story, Emma has a desire to change around the house. A popular view on this aspect is that Emma experiences a stroke of individuality.
I think the action is actually the first taste the reader gets of her incessant need for change. With every change that Emma makes, she tries to find the happiness she desires so much. An example of Emmas fluctuation of moods is after Leons departure. Once he left, to deem herself from the lack of love toward her husband, Emma transformed into the model wife.
She would go from constantly thinking about another man, to another woman that no one would even dare think about accusing of considering adultery. I think that in her variability of moods, Emma is simply lost in her desire. The contrast between her romantic illusions and the realities of society create a condition in which she has no control over her emotions. Regardless of Emma’s search for eternal passion, the dullness of her thoughts and inability to move past this dream prevent her from developing into a round character. Flaubert accentuates this point by displaying Emmas romantic struggles with Charles, Leon, and Rodolphe.
Through this, Emma ultimately creates a scornful caution against living her life through a novel. While in her physical state during pregnancy in which she was “filling out over her uncorseted hips” (Flaubert 62), Emma creates a contrast to the flatness of “her affection” for her baby which” was perhaps impaired from the start” (Flaubert 63). This is another example of Emmas imprudence, in that she particularly wanted a boy, because she thought that with it would come along new and exciting experiences and challenges. Upon the childs arrival and realization of the female gender, she quickly lost all interest in the child. This part of the novel in particular bothers me. Purely based on the fact that Emma desires to live in her romantic fantasy world, she cannot accept the reality of what occurs in real life.
A woman who can simply lose all interest in her child based on gender has serious emotional problems, and Emma is the case in point. Though Emma’s inability to interpret the emotional gravity of new life and the potential for new love suggests a deficit in her reading of life, Flaubert entails that Emma has a natural disability in appropriate expression. A person would think that such a suggestion would create sympathy for Emma. However, when she is aspiring to be “the mistress of all the novels, the heroine of all the dramas, the vague she of all volumes of verse” (Flaubert 192), I do not think that sympathy is deserved. When Emma decided to go see the priest at the church in search of some spiritual guidance, another instance of her gullibility is expressed.
Upon arriving, the priest does not seem to respect her pious needs, and quickly assumes that all she needs is a cup of tea and sends her on her way. As Emma returned home, her daughter acted as if to comfort Emma. In spite of this, Emma simply declines while pushing her away and scolding the child to keep her distance. Apparently unaware of the strength she applies, Emma pushes her daughter so hard that the girl falls and injures her head upon impact. In reaction, Emma cries and screams worriedly for the girl. This response appears a little off base, seeming as though she actually cared for the child, and Emma acts as if the child did it herself.
This instance, in addition to the way she deals with her husband, shows how unstable Emmas emotions are and